Environmental-Health Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $11.97

Review of Mad Cows and Mother's milkReview Date: 2008-08-01
A Must-Have for the Professional PR LibraryReview Date: 2000-07-01
Used price: $0.28

InterestingReview Date: 2002-06-23
He does explain why and how studies and statistics with regards to the studies are done, and that I found interesting and well put.
This is not a scientific journal, but a laymans opinions. He is not a PhD, but an attorney. However, I believe there is a lot of good information in his book. You just know when you read it, you need to look much, much further.
Warning on bad science (Alar,Love Canal,AgentOrange)Review Date: 1996-06-10
the misinformation spread about Alar, Love Canal, dioxin,
Agent Orange, food irradiation, electromagnetic field-induced
cancer, and gasohol. Fumento not only exposes the fertilizer
behind the alarmist campaigns, but provides valuable insight
into how epidemiology works, how to spot bad arguments, and
how to identify acceptable levels of risk in daily life.
Easy and fun to read text from a lawyer who has done his
research. Guaranteed to upset environmentalists, Viet Nam
vets, amateur epidemiologists, Archer-Daniels-Midland,
and anyone else who believes that science should bow to
political expedience.

Comprehensive overview of subject and materialsReview Date: 2008-08-21
I read this book for a class in graduate school, and found it to be very informative, very comprehensive, and very well presented. This is also not a book for whimps. It's well written, and goes a very long way to make a complicated subject more understandable BUT the authors do assume that you are an active reader. If you're looking for a short-cut or cheat-sheet through t his type of material, this is not the book for you. However, if you are looking for an excellent publication that gives a good overview, this is a good choice for you. In fact, when my course was over, I elected not to resell my copy. I'm keeping it in my library because it is an excellent reference source!
Poor Quality BindingReview Date: 2008-06-20

Used price: $6.45

Thornton's PoisonReview Date: 2002-01-01
There is no difference in methods used by Thornton as author of his MIT-based book and Thornton as (co)author of several brochures about chlorine/PVC as Greenpeace worker. There is only a difference in style, which makes it even more difficult for the average reader to know where the author is a little economical with the truth. Or to say it with the words of the Hamburg (Germany) court in the case of Greenpeace e.V. vs. Engelbeen: "The reader understands from the actual context of the text that Greenpeace presents facts that are overstated or, even though they give true information about a fact, they do not give all the details, so that at the very least a false impression can be created in the mind of the person receiving the message.". That is what Thornton does again and again in his work.
The basic assumption that the introduction of chlorine in an organic molecule in general makes that molecule more toxic is true. But that this is also true for the introduction of oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen(oxides), phosphor(oxides), etc. is omitted. Every organochlorine that can be inhaled, ingested or can pass the skin is toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, hormone-disrupting, etc. at some dose. But that is also the case for all organics, whether these contain only carbon and hydrogen (as is especially the case for aromatics) or other elements like oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen,... Again that is omitted from the book.
The introduction of chlorine makes a molecule more fat soluble, but that is similar to the addition of a CH3 group (an extra carbon with three hydrogen atoms) to such a molecule. Indeed some organochlorines are POPs (persistent organic pollutants), that means persistent *and* bio-accumulating *and* toxic. A few hundred of the more than 10,000 industrial and over 2,000 natural organochlorines can be found in human blood. With the today's analytical techniques, we can assume that most of the others are either not persistent enough, or don't bio-accumulate at all, or are released in such minute quantities that they can't be detected, even not after bio-accumulation, which makes their environmental relevance rather questionable. But that also can be said of a few hundred of non-chlorinated materials like PAHs and nitro-PAHs. While their bio-accumulation is mainly at the lower end of the food chain, their impact is far higher than for organochlorines like dioxins, as they are released in quantities which are orders of magnitude higher. Further, (nitro)PAHs are cancer inducers, while dioxins are cancer promoters at high levels, but cancer inhibitors at low levels...
One can write a similar book about the dangers of oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, phosphor,... for all life on earth. That will be more difficult than for chlorine, for the simple reason that much less is known of the results of the introduction of these elements into organics. But what is known don't make them less suspect than organochlorines. And nature is not less toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic,... than industry, to the contrary...
A few examples
of (deliberate?) omissions by Thornton: Half lives of organochlorines are given in *pure* water (page 33). E.g. for 1,2 dichloroethane
(EDC, an intermediate for making PVC) that is 72 *years*. That has nothing to do with real life, where bacteria break down
EDC within three *days* (figure from the biological waste water treatment where I work)!
Thornton only gives carcinogenity
figures for organochlorines and omits these for the "safe" alternatives (page 60). According to the German Occupational Health
Authority, 50% of the workplace carcinogens are nitrogen compounds, 30% others (metals, hydrocarbons) and 20% contain chlorine,
while chlorine is involved in 60% of all chemical processes...
Thornton gives the graph of dioxin deposition to the Great
Lakes sediment (page 228), but stops in 1980, so that there is a good correlation with chlorine production. But he omits the
1980-2000 data which show that with steady chlorine production (and a tripled PVC production), dioxin deposition has fallen
dramatically back to the pre-1945 levels.
Thornton even promotes alternatives for PVC (page 366), where the process (iron
ore sintering, all from uncontaminated raw materials!) emits orders of magnitude more dioxins than PVC in its whole life cycle.
The steel sector is good for 118 g TEQ dioxins in Belgium, the PVC industry emits only 0.025 g... Rather strange for a promotor
af the "precautionary principle"...
There are such incredible (deliberate?) errors in what he says about the emissions of the EDC/VCM factory where I work, which are published every year since 1989 (and occasionally by the Dutch government and the UNEP), which are known by Greenpeace, that this alone completely discredits his work.
But if you believe that chlorine is invented by the devil, this is the book for you. If you are more critical, look at the detailed critique on the Chlorophiles web pages...
Sincerely,
Ferdinand Engelbeen
Worker in a chlorine/EDC/VCM/herbicides production site in Rotterdam, The
Netherlands.
Double Value: on Environmental *and* Information StrategyReview Date: 2001-06-02
This is the best of the several environmentally-oriented books I have reviewed recently, and it offers a double value: not only does it lay out a persuasive social, economic, and political case for abandoning the Risk Paradigm of permissive pollution in favor of an Environmental Paradigm of zero pollution; but it also provides a very fine--really excellent--case for why the current government and industry approaches to information about the environment and threats to the environment are severely flawed. In a nutshell, the current approach divorces "good science" (code for permitting what you can't prove will kill the planet today) from social consciousness and good policy; and the current approach insists on studying risk one contaminant at a time, rather than as a whole.
This book is persuasive; I believe author has the right stuff and should be consulted on major policy issues. I believe the underlying moral values and intellectual arguments that this book makes, about both science and social policy, should be adopted by the Cultural Creatives and the independent voters of America, and that the recommendations of this book are so serious as to warrant country by country translations and promulgation.
This book is exceptional in that is combines a readable policy essay for the non-technical citizen, with deeply documented technical appendices and notes that support a middle ground series of chapters relating scientific findings to long-term policy issues.
From many small actions come revolutionary change--this book is a necessary brick in the road to environmental reform. The bottom line is clear: every year more and more toxins are building up in our blood streams, and this is going to have an overwhelmingly negative impact on the humanity, capability, and survivability of our great grandchildren three generations down--we have not have grandchildren seven generations down if the insights from this book fail to reach the people, and through the people, the policy makers and legislators.
A well crafted deceptionReview Date: 2001-03-10
Pandora's thinkingReview Date: 2006-02-25
Thornton states "organochlorines dominate virtually all of the official and unofficial lists of hazardous pollutants in the environment." It is less appreciated environmental scientists merely scratch the surface of chemical complexity. There may be tens of thousands of residues of synthetic (and natural) compounds that could be detected in the environment with sensitive analytic methods. Yet for many substances, no analytic methods exist, nor is there a comprehensive program to explore the potentially vast universe. Thornton is crucially misled by accepting official and unofficial lists as comprehensive or thoughtful. This selection bias leads him to focus on chlorine-compounds. His book is based on myopic appreciation of chemical complexity in the environment. This problem also pervades many studies on which Thornton relies and cites. It is wiser to appreciate how little is known about substance residues in the environment than to assume environmental chemists are doing more than scratching the surface of what could be analyzed.
Statistical association does not establish causality. Yet, this fundamental principle is oft forgotten, owing to hunger for a pollutant to blame. Papers published in journals may properly mention a pollutant is only "associated" with an effect. In common discussion, however, well-intentioned people may claim causality that is not established and even far-fetched. Given the myriad of synthetic residues in the environment, how could one be distinguished as harmful, to the exclusion of the vast array of other possibilities, known or unknown? Generally, it cannot. The eminent epidemiologist Sir Richard Peto, who helped establish the case against cigarettes, opines today that "an incredible amount of epidemiological rubbish is published." How true. Then some of these rubbish studies can be lumped together in a book like this one.
Our health is influenced by the foods that we eat. These too contain enormous chemical complexity, including natural pesticides intrinsic to plants, defenses against predators. When chemists report much lower exposures to synthetic residues, it is very difficult to isolate their risk, amid all the potentially confounding factors. Generally, risk estimates are based NOT on observed dose/response relationships at environmental doses, but on cautious assumptions derived from vastly higher doses to test species. Some claim we have "toxic chemicals" in our bodies. In a sense they are right, but only because all substances are toxic in sufficient dose. There will often be low doses below which no harm is likely. An everyday example: taking an aspirin may be healthful, but to swallow a bottle of pills might be fatal. Is aspirin toxic? Yes, at sufficient dose, no, at apt doses. By this logic, laundry lists of chemicals with supposed propensity to induce cancer, such as Table 2.1, set aside the essential issue of dose and signify nothing.
Organo-chlorines "build to higher and higher concentrations in air, water, and sediments." How to explain the 95+ percent decline in many organo-chlorines on a global basis during the past three decades? Conveniently unmentioned.
Thornton errs by claiming the first chlor-alkali production technology used mercury. Diaphragm factories began in Germany during 1890, whereas the first mercury cell factory began in 1894. A trivial error, yet needless, germane when an author is writing about this industry.
Thornton alludes to the promise of greener substances. Tellingly, this notion is not elaborated upon in any meaningful way. He seems to imagine a world in which all waste materials are instantly biodegraded. This is a common delusion among those who believe in a faith called Green Chemistry.
Some environmentalists dwell on a few old bugaboos, yet do not call for exploration of whether substances used today - including ones without chlorine -- yield environmental residues. They look narrowly or backwards. "The scale and severity of the [chlorine] threat is rivaled only by the hazards associated with climate change, nuclear technologies, and the reduction of biological diversity." How can someone in effect compare vinyl siding (containing chlorine) to a nuclear weapon? When an author does not pay heed to uncertainties and adopts simplifying assumptions, he is absurdly led to equate a socially useful, ubiquitous plastic with a nuclear weapon. One is reminded of poet William Butler Yeats: "the worst are full of passionate intensity."
Thornton suggests sperm abundance is decreasing among human males, owing to chlorine. Since this book was published by MIT Press, the unsuspecting might be troubled. Would not a press at a distinguished university aim to convey facts, with responsible appreciation for uncertainties?
What is the author's dreamy solution? A government-designed economy, steered by a technocratic elite of scientists in good standing among environmental activists. During the course of the 20th century, political planning of economies has fallen into disrepute. The thinking in this book helps exemplify why.
Hydrochloric acid in our stomach helps digest food and destroy disease agents. This biological need for chlorine is not to be learned from Thornton.
Yet, his book has value, even if entirely unintended. It could serve as reading material for a graduate-level class that aims to help students cultivate critical thinking on environmental topics. Strongly-held concerns about exposures to trace chemicals seem common in the U.S. media. Education that empowers students to weigh over-hyped claims carefully could serve the public good.
What are some books that offer more reliable education? There are many good ones, of which a few options:
John Emsley. The Consumer's Good Chemical Guide. (W.H. Freeman)
W. Baarschers. eco-facts & eco-fiction. (Routledge)
Aaron Wildalsky. But is it True? (Harvard U Press).
Geoffrey Kabat. Hyping Health Risks: environmental hazards in daily life and the science of epidmemiology. Columbia Univ. Press.
J. Rodricks. Calculated Risks: understanding the toxicity and human health risks of chemicals in our environment (Cambridge U. Press).
John F. Ross. Living Dangerously: navigating the risks of everyday life. (Perseus)
National Research Council. Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens in the human diet. National Academy Press.
A Clear Eyed View of The Problem...And A SolutionReview Date: 2002-06-15
The current industry-driven approach which assumes chemicals "innocent until proven guilty" has clearly failed us. It is based on a microscopic and simple linear chemical-by-chemical rating system. This approach does not take into account accumulation of pollutants nor does it address the myriad and exponential effects of the chemicals in all the complex systems in the biosphere whose dynamics are still only dimly understood. This approach is heavily tilted towards the polluters as Mr. Thornton so skillfully shows.
Mr. Thornton presents a solution that includes a much more prudent "guilty until proven innocent" approach that puts the rights of human beings and the planet first. He proposes viable alternatives for chlorine-based products and proposes a new paradigm for rating chemicals and classes of chemicals that takes into account all the "unknowns" and accumulation problems that the pro-industry (and one currently used by our own EPA)...does not.
Mr. Thornton advocates true science be applied to the problem instead of the "good science" that industry always touts. Unfortunately the term [servant]whore to corporate interests.
A call to arms has been rasied and champion has arisen. Mr. Thornton, on behalf of all humans, plants, and animals....thank you. An excellent job and stunningly good book.

Kingsley Amis - in a world of his ownReview Date: 1999-03-19
Another good oneReview Date: 1999-11-24
entertaining, not involvingReview Date: 1999-03-08
Amis crafts a timely story of post cold war social comment.Review Date: 1999-01-17

Used price: $4.38

Living on Lesssss- Less is more with this book Don't buy It.Review Date: 2003-04-08
A good book for those stating the process of self sufficencyReview Date: 1999-01-18
Not a waste of money, but nor worth $30Review Date: 2004-04-10
Some good stuff, but nothing newReview Date: 2002-04-10
Otherwise, it is a great compilation of material that a beginner might not know. It's a heavy read, but great if you have a pressing interest in the subject material. It's heavy on the "getting there" and lighter on the "when you've gotten there" info. I've read better books on the subject -- but I've read worse, too.

Used price: $0.55

Ideology heavy, technically lightReview Date: 1999-06-11
1. Chapter 2, pg. 9, Mr. Foreman notes that hazardous waste facilities handle only a fraction of the hazardous waste generated in the U.S. The remainder being processed on site. These are treatment and concentration technologies that allow the waste to be transfered to TSDF facilities in highly concentrated form. This statement is self-evident to anyone with a background in environmental science and engineering..further the source of this quote is cited as a Waste Management Inc. executive, one of the first corporations to be named in the early EJ litigation..hardly an unbiased technical source.
2. Numerous statements in the chapter on Health are made concerning the impact of environmental exposures on health which should be supported by sound technical references on the topic. This field with the exception of lead is largely unexplored..which Foreman notes. However, some of the skepticism exhibited in this analysis in regard to the health impacts of environmental exposures is supported by such sources as The Washington Times and The Atlantic Monthly, while wonderful publications in there own right, they are not scientific, technical journals dealing solely with the issue of environmental health and human exposure.
The lack of technical rigor exhibited in, what is in my opinion, a highly critical review of a grassroots movement left me dissappointed. I had hoped for a work that encouraged and inspired EJ advocates to a more vital movement.
The book provides an outstanding analysis of EJ issuesReview Date: 1999-02-26
The book is formatted in a style of a graduate-level textbook, with all of the sources of the book properly documented. This format, however, does not detract from the book's analysis of the public policy issues associated with Environmental Justice. I enjoyed Foreman's writing style and thought some passages were especially well-written. I wish all of my textbooks would have been this compelling.
As an environmental compliance professional at a highly visible facility, I never quite understood why certain residents were so hostile toward our facility, why the efforts of local activists were at times disjointed, or why regulators would subject themselves to seemingly unnecessary public meetings. This book clarifies the motivations of these various groups in dealing with controversial facilities. I would recommend this book to both environmental regulators and compliance personnel in the private sector. I believe that meaningful strategies for community involvement in environmental permitting can be crafted based on the analysis presented in this book.
Long on ideology, light on substanceReview Date: 1999-12-29
The book provides an outstanding analysis of EJ issuesReview Date: 2000-06-15
The book is formatted in a style of a graduate-level textbook, with all of the sources of the book properly documented. This format, however, does not detract from the book's analysis of the public policy issues associated with Environmental Justice. I enjoyed Foreman's writing style and thought some passages were especially well-written. I wish all of my textbooks would have been this compelling.
As an environmental compliance professional at a highly visible facility, I never quite understood why certain residents were so hostile toward our facility, why the efforts of local activists were at times disjointed, or why regulators would subject themselves to seemingly unnecessary public meetings. This book clarifies the motivations of these various groups in dealing with controversial facilities. I would recommend this book to both environmental regulators and compliance personnel in the private sector. I believe that meaningful strategies for community involvement in environmental permitting can be crafted based on the analysis presented in this book.

Used price: $113.83

helpful, but not greatReview Date: 2007-08-21
The book would benefit greatly from being more specific. E.g. it talks about how panels in a room need to be washable and made of non-outgassing materials, but fails to be specific enough on what materials actually can be used (the only specific construction materials mentioned were steel, aluminum and PVC, with the latter being an outgassing plastic). Brand names and type of paint, are not mentioned.
Same with protective clothing: it specifies how small/large the pores need to be but fails to provide a good selection of brand names that work (other than Tyvek and Goretex).
It appears the author is more knowlegable in the area of protective clothing, filtration, and cleanroom conduct, but is probably less knowledgable in the area of construction materials.
A list of references embedded in the text, science writing style, would also help.
Not yet deliveredReview Date: 2007-01-12
I already payed the charge money. I wonder what is goning on.
comprehensive and soundReview Date: 2007-05-29

Used price: $0.01

A good resource, but should not be your only resourceReview Date: 2007-11-11
First, the book reads like an advertisement for the different products that Gilbere has used or recommends for people with MCS. By all means, if they help you, buy them, but I would carefully consider what may or may not help you before you spend a lot of money.
Second, the book is somewhat poorly written and dances around the issue of what really will cure specific diseases. Your specific problem may be solved by just one of her recommendations, or none of them, but her shotgun approach involves a great deal of time, effort, and possibly discomfort for the patient and much of the products and procedures can be debated as to whether they are helpful - or proven.
Last, the book does cover the emotional elements of psychosomatic/chemical illnesses but is perhaps underemphasized. WAY underemphasized.
I would recommend the book, as I mentioned in the title, but I wouldn't use it as your only resource. Also, good judgement must be used - the book can do more harm than good if you are averse to chemical smells or food additives and so on - reading about the different negative effects of chemicals and what is making our air, food, and enviornment toxic can lead to greater fear of adverse effects and a more restricted lifestyle. econ
NOTHING NEWReview Date: 2007-05-20
Another AWESOME book!Review Date: 2002-09-09
This would be a very good investment in anyone's health to read this book.
"Be Well"

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $10.00

Sierra Club Guide to Safe Drinking Water reviewedReview Date: 2002-09-04
Good political info, not enough personal adviceReview Date: 2002-03-25
Clearest guide ever on how to ensure your water is safe!Review Date: 1996-07-27
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250