Disability-and-Health Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $10.69

A Good First StepReview Date: 2008-06-08

Used price: $0.44
Collectible price: $19.95

An excellent book on the struggle in apartheid South AfricaReview Date: 2008-04-20

Used price: $47.98

use it or lose itReview Date: 2007-12-11

much useful advice for social workersReview Date: 2008-12-19
There are numerous case studies of families afflicted [if this is the right word] by having a severely disabled kid. You get suggestions on how to gain the parents' confidence, and to give useful tips. A big thing is getting the families aware of resources available to them by the government. Often the families might simply not know, or be chary of interacting with government officials. The text also asks you to encourage them to integrate into the broader community, rather than self segregate into Pakistani or Indian groups.

Basic and informativeReview Date: 2000-04-26

Used price: $26.96

A Useful & Utilitarian Book for Parents of Children w/ NeedsReview Date: 2002-02-01
Far from being a strictly professionally oriented book, there's also places for likes and dislikes, daily routines, and places to fill in behaviors ("When I'm sad I...") and to fill in what would make the child feel certain ways ("these are situations that I feel aggressive/sad/happy/etc."). It would also be a great thing to have if your child ever needed to be hospitalized - the nurses and doctors would know exactly what your child needs, what medications s/he's taking, allergies, dietary needs, cultural considerations, etc.
This is an invaluable book if you have a child with needs that perhaps cannot communicate these things to a caregiver. I bought one for my daughter, who is autistic. The next time she visits family, this book will go with her, so that no one has any doubt about what they should do in any given situation. I highly recommend it!

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $25.00

The Add AnswerReview Date: 2008-07-06
and gave lots of suggestions for parents dealing with an ADD child.
Response to Concerned MomReview Date: 2005-11-07
Before 86-ing this book, look at your own source, which is 5 years old. Also consider that the vast majority of the psychiatric profession in Europe believes ADD is a figment of the American psychiatric community's imagination. If they're right, anyone who believes ADD is a genuine disorder is a pseudoscientist, whether they believe it can be conclusively diagnosed or not.
In addressing ADD and ADHD Dr. Phil and Frank have both maintained that a thorough attempt at a differential diagnosis MUST be made(ruling out other learning disorders, stressors in the home, other possible disorders or chemical imbalances, depression, etc.) PRIOR to reaching a diagnosis of ADD/ADHD. They also insist that this must be done in CONJUNCTION with an EEG. The EEG reading alone is persuasive, but not diagnostic. If they have claimed to the contrary then they are going against everything they have maintained in their shows addressing this issue.
You may agree or disagree with them and I'm sure some qualified professionals disagree with them as well. That's not uncommon in the medical community, and it certainly doesn't make this pseudo science.
If their claim were simply that the EEG ALONE were diagnostic in the absence of a thorough examination of patient history, etc., then you're beef would be legitimate. But why the hostility? These days children are often overmedicated based solely on the reommendation of tired parents or teachers. By contrast Dr. Phil is advocating a careful thorough screening prior to reaching that diagnosis, and consideration of all available therapies, not medical therapy alone. At the same time the screening process he's advocating will no doubt help some people who haven't been diagnosed but should have been finally get the help they need. So many are written of an depressed or looking for excuses for a lifelong struggle with frustration and attention span (my wife for example), but thanks to a rigorous screening process followed by a careful neurological exam including an EEG, most of the red herrings can finally be ruled out and effective treatment can begin. This is a total middle of the road position between throwing pills out willy nilly and just telling people to get over their disorder. Who loses here? And where is the argument that the EEG IN CONJUNCTION WITH a careful differential diagnosis, detailed patient history and examination of past behavior, academic struggles, etc., can't be diagnostic of this disorder? Some may disagree, but what's new about that?
The three star rating is because I haven't finished reading the book.
Excellent!Review Date: 2007-03-29
A concerned adult with ADHDReview Date: 2006-02-27
This book is so full of pseudo-science that I fear it may cause a great deal of harm to children and adults with ADHD. Dr. Lawless is a psychologist and should now how to read the scientifice research on the subject found in peer reviewed journals. While, I believe that the chemeicals in the foods we eat are a major cause of illnesses, ADHD and obesity, There is little scientific evidence that add is caused by diet. However, their maybe more evidence in the future. One of his clames of red dye has been proven completly false. Another one his claims about magnet theropy are so out of the scientific mainstream that he comes of as a snakeoils salesman. Please do not buy this book. If you want reliable information by on of the Driven to Distraction books.
PLEASE READ BEFORE BUYING!Review Date: 2005-10-27
1. "approx 70% of patients respond to the first stimulant agent administered with resulting improvement in their ADHD symptoms." - Practical Considerations in Stimulant Drug Selection for the ADHD Patient- Efficacy, Potency and Titration Beiderman, Today's Therapeutic Trends, 02'
2. "Improvement occurred in 65-75% of 5,899 patients randomized to stimulants." - Practice Parameter for the Use of Stimulant Medication in the Treatment of Children, Adolescents, and Adults, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Feb02'
3. "At least 80% of children will respond to one of the stimulants if they are tried in a systemic way." Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of the School-Aged Child with ADHD, Published in American Acedemy of Pediatrics, Oct 01'.
All of these quotes are credible and are opinions based on evidence-based medicine from the experts. Lawlis also states that there has been little research in children and that most studies have been done on adults and rats/mice. This is Completely False! The Journal noted above, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (that was a review of "161 randomized controlled trials that have been published encompassing 5 preschool, 150 school-age, 7 Adolescent, and 9 adult studies" Where does Dr. Lawlis get his information?
The review noted above by the American Acedemy of Pediatrics, identified for analysis 2405 citations, 92 reports, and 78 different studies. This is American Acedemy of Pediatrics- They are only interested in children and adolescents! Not Rats, Mice, and Adults.
These are the most credible Medical Journals published. These are not the biased trials sponsored by big pharma. The information in these Journals is taken very seriously by Pediatricians and Child Psychiatrists, and is heavily relied upon by these professionals.
Lastly, he also states that these drugs are identical to cocaine in their affect on the brain. This is not true, they have similarities, but by NO-Means identical. Yes it is true that stimulant medications can be abused and can also be addictive, but some of the newer formulations of these meds have lessened their abuse and addictive potential by altering the speed at which the drug is released into the bloodstream thereby somewhat flattening the curve (Cocaine use produces a curve that is almost straight up-this is what gives the "high") The most common way for these drugs to be abused is by crushing them and snorting them (which allows for fast absorption and steep curve), and some of the newer meds are crush resistant and/or cannot be turned into a fine enough substance to be snorted. There has also been data published that shows a DECREASE not increase in drug abuse for patients who have taken stimulants. It is believed that kids who are treated (drug treatment and otherwise) are less likely to associate with kids who are failing academically/socially and who are more likely to be using drugs. (This is not to say that high all high achievers abstain from using OR that ALL children who are failing ARE using) It is just a point that kids who are treated are more likely to be focused on school and their responsibilities and are less likely to be involved in drug use. Kids who are failing in school academically/socially are often looked at as outcasts and are often looked down upon by peers, teachers, and family, and this can cause a child to look for an escape... sometimes drugs. Children who Do benefit from stimulant medication sometimes have more self-esteem because of their success, and certainly less scrutiny from peers, teachers etc.
Lastly, Lawlis tells a story about a man who died from long-term stimulant medication. I am not going to say that this did not happen, but I will say that stimulants have been used since the 1950's, and the medical community agrees that they are safe when managed properly. The medical community and FDA have pulled MANY medications that were deemed unsafe from the markets (many times against the will of BIG Pharma) and the stimulants would not have remained on the market for OVER 50 YEARS, if stories like this were common or the least bit likely.
I am not at all stating that stimulant meds are the answer because they are not, but they can be a small piece of the puzzle that is helping these kids with ADD. The book is full of great ideas and approaches to ADD, but he is not accurate about the stimulant medications. Parents who see value in them should not feel ashamed and or frightened by what he says because most of it is just not accurate. Good luck and I hope this was helpful.

Used price: $6.93

Very easy to understand, isn't it ?Review Date: 2008-06-04
Gunilla Gerland writes everything so briefly that I bet even Non English-speaking people diagnosed as Asperger Syndrome, High Functioning Autism, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder will get what the book is all about! Since I was already diagnosed, I could easily point out what kind of syndromes apply to me right now. Sudden Changes, clumsiness, stressful peer pressure; these are exactly what I have suffered for ages. And according to my doctor, I have some difficulties in reading implications, which still gives me a real headache!
So the point is you need to read this book whether you are diagnosed or not sure you have AS, autism, PDD, and any kinds of developmental problems. And if you find your problems that apply to you, you'll eventually know yourself as well as how to cope with them.
MISREPRESENTEDReview Date: 2002-11-15
Disappointing.Review Date: 2002-12-04
I think it would have been too vague and abstract in placesReview Date: 2004-03-13
I found this book to use language that is too abstract for me to understand many sections of it. I can see myself reading it as a child, or even recently, and thinking, "This little bit makes sense, that little bit makes sense, but I can't even understand the rest of it enough to know if it makes sense or not." I can see myself reading many parts of the book that apply to me, but not recognizing them as applying because the words are too confusing. For instance, it talks about not liking change, which is not something I would have understood the words for. I might have understood better if it had talked about how change could affect me irrespective of whether I liked it or not. Many of the ideas, like thinking differently or asking during misunderstandings, sound so abstract and vague that I still can't make that much sense out of them without a lot of other knowledge about autism that I have gotten from elsewhere.
The good thing about this book is that it does not present autism as a wholly negative thing, and gives a strong message that autistic people can be proud of who we are. The problem is that if I had read this at any time in my life as an introduction to autism, I would not have known much better than I had before what autism was in the first place.
Simple, Easy to Understand, Phenominal Book!Review Date: 2001-12-27

Used price: $4.12

Perfect book to read to younger kidsReview Date: 2007-05-06
Good Story, But May Overgeneralize...Review Date: 2004-05-15
Need conclusionReview Date: 2005-09-17
Appropriate and EnjoyableReview Date: 2006-06-29
I disagree with the person whose review states that the "sterotypical" behavior of the child spinning the frisbee is a negative thing. This is simply one example of a type of sensory need our friends on the spectrum have, and it opens the door to discussion about it.
Good resource for inclusion - it gets the kids talkingReview Date: 2005-01-12

Used price: $1.67

Until there is a better term, it's a great book anywayReview Date: 2004-05-03
AD/HD from a kids point of viewReview Date: 2004-04-21
Just rightReview Date: 2002-01-03
It doesn't dumb down the criteria. It shows the child being the hero of the story using some of his natural abilities. It also shows some of the techniques he develops for learning. It is a wonderful story for any child with or without a disability.
disappointedReview Date: 2007-03-29
My son hated it.Review Date: 2005-09-14
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
My daughter and I have both been diagnosed with AS, which I think is a personality type but which my wife thinks is a disorder. Since a happy wife = a happy home I have been plowing through the available literature on AS. I am pretty sure my daughter will be fine but my wife lacks my faith so I keep reading.
Apparently I have been finding ways to work around my "disorder" for 40 years. Unsurprisingly I have some strong opinions about AS. (No I am not Mr. Popular, but I get by in a job I can do alone, and I go shopping and do chores early Thursday mornings while everyone else is at work.)
A gross oversimplification of the Bliss/Edmonds method is to find what is working for the patient and to encourage him or her to do it more, in the hopes that what works will compensate for what doesn't work. ("Building on Strengths")
In my opinion this is a good first step but eventually it will become a crutch. If you don't become more flexible, if you don't develop a wider variety of skills, you will barely get by and you will not thrive.
At some point you will have to learn consciously how to do stuff that other people are "hard wired" to do. ("Turn a Weakness into a Strength") Apparently you and I are missing some "social instinct". (Like a computer missing a sound card.) It's not fair, but we have to put work into doing what comes naturally for others.
The GOOD news is that if you are willing to make this effort, all indications are you have a VERY good chance of become a leader in whatever field you choose. AS may be a blessing in disguise.
Don't give up!